An article I read in our Sunday Mail about a paedophile who the courts want to release back into society, but they are worried about public attacks or media criticism.
Apparently the court has been told the community poses a risk to Mark Trevor Marshall. Yes I can say his name here, it's all over the newspaper article, so hardly a secret.
Instead of Mark being a risk to the general community, they think the community would be a risk for him??
Psychiatrists have said that this type of stress could cause him to revert and reoffend.
He has currently only been in jail since 2009 and apparently "they" think that is long enough.
The almighty "they" who think they know better than the rest of us. hmpf.
Well, I read the entire article and I say he'd reoffend with or without stress.
You might say, "well everyone is entitled to a second chance" and that's fair, but this man, Mark Marshall, has had a second chance.
Also third, fourth and fifth chances.
Beginning back in 1987, when he was found guilty of 13 indecent assaults against children.
For that he got a paltry three month suspended sentence.
Two years later, seven indecent assaults against girls aged 5 to 7.
More of the same in 1992, including a boy this time, then again in 1996......you seeing a pattern here?
The man can't control himself!!
He can't wait to get his hands on more children!
Perhaps your children.
Over the years he has destroyed the innocence of 24 children, and served only a total of just over five years in jail.
And now they want to let him out again, but they're worried that the community and media might be against him and cause him some stress?
How can the courts and parole boards look at his record and NOT throw away the key to his cell?
His photo is here in the paper, right beside my computer, he looks very smug, like he thinks he's beaten the courts and psychiatrists and will soon be free to find other children.
And he's not an old man, he looks young enough to continue his depravities for many years yet.
"....currently incarcerated for trying to have nine rolls of film developed of a three-year-old girl in various sexual positions."
Ummm, where was her mother??
A direct quote from the journalist...>>>"to put it bluntly, there is no good reason to let Marshall out of jail-ever."