from Tuesday's newspaper

 Excerpts from an article by Emily Olle, if she reads this and objects, I will remove the post.

*(in rent costs)*= my contribution

Open for rejection: Rental crisis....

"Every day a new story emerges about this state's crippling rental crisis. A couple forced to pitch a tent in Mannum, or a single father of four copping an almost $200-a-week rise *(in rent costs)* to keep a roof over his children's heads. 

Sadly, these are far from the exception. They're quickly becoming the rule for those in the rental market seeking the basic human right of a place to live. 

Let's talk through the process. Applications. Much like filling out your dating profile, you go through dozens, if not hundreds of them, and spill your deepest, darkest secrets to a complete stranger. Name, age, income, references, dating history, first pet, where were you on the night of December 17, 1967?

Then you have to make time for the date. Can you make it at 11am on a Tuesday? Interestingly, Amber from the real estate agency, I cannot. Because I am at work. Which you are aware of, because I've sent you a document outlining every job I've ever had. But, if I want to be considered for a property, I will not be at work. Because I will be at the inspection. 

You walk through. Like the man who claims to be 190cm tall on his profile, the agent describes the house as having "great bones". What they actually meant was the shower was condemned in 1913 and the living room is the size of a prison cell, but with slightly more muld and slightly less structural integrity.

Now, after all that, you walk out of the property and hear over your shoulder: "Now, I'm not going to be putting in an application. I'll offer you $100 more per week."

You turn around. It's a businessman in his early 60s. Empty-nesting, of course. More equity in his pinky finger than you have to your name. You're done for. 

And then, perhaps three or four days later, the death blow. A rejection text, "Hello,(insert name). Your application has been unsuccessful. Good luck in your search."

The hunt continues, with the pile of applications growing and an unnerving sense of despair rising with it. Finally, you get the call. You've found a home. It's $50 more than you are realistically able to pay and is so close to the train line the carriages might as well be running directly through your brain, but you've found a home. 

The renting process is flawed at best, and dehumanising at worst, and it's time for something to change."


*My contribution again:*(I have no idea how the governments can solve this crisis, apart from focusing on rapid repair of the many currently empty housing trust properties, and building more to replace those that got sold off, and perhaps putting a cap on the amount of rents landlords are allowed to charge for homes, particularly those that are smaller, older, with outdated facilities, tiny or no, backyards and probably cracks in the walls.)*

Comments

  1. Certainly a massive problem R. It's the same down here, and what is offered isn't worth the money so I'm told.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Margaret D; it's a huge problem worldwide I fear. The homeless are beginning to outnumber those with somewhere to live, while here in Adelaide at least, many housing trust places are sitting empty because there isn't the funds available to fix them up. I would suggest putting people in them and then fixing things using part of the rent money they pay.

      Delete
  2. Rapid repair and rebuilding are essential starting points. And perhaps taking away things like capital gains tax reductions that encourage the wealthy to buy more and more properties - and offset the profits while screwing the tenants for the highest possible rates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elephant's Child; I'd forgotten about those tax reductions. They never should have been allowed in the first place.

      Delete
  3. Mercy, do they take fingerprints and DNA? Am so grateful I own my little house.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Arkansas Patti; no they don't, thank goodness. That would be too much hassle for everyone concerned I think.

      Delete
  4. There are more people here than homes. Sadly, the homes and rents are too high.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joanne; it's the same everywhere and it all comes back to greed, whether investors or landlords. Money is what runs the world.

      Delete
  5. Top it off, here, with the fact that builders and developers only want to build single family homes for sale, not apartment complexes that are desperately needed by people who cannot afford to buy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. messymimi; we have the opposite; developers tearing down old houses on large blocks, then building multi-storey apartments or many townhouses which then are put up for sale at prices many people simply can't afford.

      Delete
  6. one of a dozen things happening that is knocking out our lower middle class

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yellowdoggranny; I'm glad I'm not in that class. I'm below that and quite used to managing on very little money. I live in public housing, a tiny one bedroom unit with a kitchen barely big enough to turn around in, but at least I have a roof over my head with affordable rent.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

being unaccustomed to public speaking,

Words for Wednesday